GCP vs AWS: Provider Comparison Guide
This guide provides a detailed technical comparison between GCP and AWS for Kubernetes deployments, helping you choose the right provider for your needs.
Quick Decision Matrix
| Use Case | Recommended Provider | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Learning/Testing | GCP or AWS (both work) | Choose based on familiarity |
| Cost-Conscious | GCP | Generally lower costs, simpler pricing |
| Enterprise/Scale | AWS | Larger ecosystem, more services |
| Google Workspace Integration | GCP | Native integration |
| Existing AWS Infrastructure | AWS | Leverage existing resources |
| Multi-Region Global | AWS | More regions, better global coverage |
| Startup/Small Team | GCP | Simpler, faster to get started |
Core Infrastructure Comparison
Kubernetes Clusters
| Feature | GCP (GKE) | AWS (EKS) |
|---|---|---|
| Service Name | Google Kubernetes Engine | Elastic Kubernetes Service |
| Control Plane | Fully managed, free | Managed, $0.10/hour |
| Networking Model | VPC-native (simpler) | CNI plugin (more flexible) |
| Node Management | Node pools | Node groups |
| Auto-scaling | Built-in cluster autoscaler | Cluster autoscaler addon |
| Upgrade Process | Rolling upgrades | Rolling updates |
| Private Clusters | Built-in private endpoint | Requires VPC endpoints |
| Workload Identity | Workload Identity (native) | IRSA (IAM Roles for Service Accounts) |
| Setup Complexity | Lower | Higher |
| Time to Deploy | ~5-8 minutes | ~10-15 minutes |
Key Differences:
Networking:
- GKE: VPC-native networking - pods get VPC IPs directly, simpler IP management
- EKS: Uses CNI plugin (VPC CNI) - more complex but more flexible
Control Plane:
- GKE: Free control plane
- EKS: $0.10/hour (~$73/month) for control plane
Private Endpoints:
- GKE: Built-in private endpoint option
- EKS: Requires VPC endpoints or VPN for private access
Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)
| Feature | GCP VPC | AWS VPC |
|---|---|---|
| Subnet Types | Regional (span zones) | Zonal (per availability zone) |
| IP Ranges | CIDR blocks | CIDR blocks |
| Routing | Route tables | Route tables |
| NAT Gateway | Cloud NAT | NAT Gateway |
| Internet Gateway | Internet Gateway | Internet Gateway |
| Flow Logs | VPC Flow Logs | VPC Flow Logs |
| Private Google Access | ✅ Built-in | ❌ N/A (AWS equivalent: VPC endpoints) |
Key Differences:
Subnet Design:
- GCP: Subnets are regional (span multiple zones)
- AWS: Subnets are zonal (one per availability zone)
Private Service Access:
- GCP: Private Google Access enables private access to GCP services
- AWS: VPC endpoints provide private access to AWS services
Container Registries
| Feature | GCP Artifact Registry | AWS ECR |
|---|---|---|
| Service Name | Artifact Registry | Elastic Container Registry |
| Image Storage | Regional or multi-regional | Regional |
| Image Scanning | ✅ Vulnerability scanning | ✅ Vulnerability scanning |
| Lifecycle Policies | ✅ Automatic cleanup | ✅ Lifecycle policies |
| IAM Integration | ✅ Service accounts | ✅ IAM roles |
| Pricing | $0.10/GB/month | $0.10/GB/month |
| URL Format | REGION-docker.pkg.dev/PROJECT/REPO | ACCOUNT.dkr.ecr.REGION.amazonaws.com/REPO |
Key Differences:
Regional vs Global:
- GCP: Can be multi-regional for global access
- AWS: Always regional (must replicate manually)
Authentication:
- GCP: Service account keys or Workload Identity
- AWS: IAM roles or access keys
Network Security
| Feature | GCP Firewall Rules | AWS Security Groups |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Network-level | Instance/ENI-level |
| Rule Type | Allow + Deny | Allow-only (implicit deny) |
| Targets | Tags, service accounts | Security groups, IPs |
| Priorities | ✅ Priority-based | ❌ No priorities |
| Stateful | ✅ Stateful | ✅ Stateful |
| Direction | Ingress + Egress | Ingress + Egress |
Key Differences:
Rule Model:
- GCP: Can explicitly deny traffic (deny-all rules)
- AWS: Allow-only (implicit deny for unmatched traffic)
Scope:
- GCP: Network-level (applies to all matching instances)
- AWS: Instance-level (each instance can have multiple security groups)
Priorities:
- GCP: Rules have priorities (lower number = higher priority)
- AWS: No priorities (all rules evaluated)
Database Services
| Feature | GCP Cloud SQL | AWS RDS |
|---|---|---|
| Proxy Service | Cloud SQL Proxy (Kubernetes pod) | RDS Proxy (managed service) |
| Connection Pooling | ❌ No (use PgBouncer) | ✅ Built-in |
| Failover | ✅ Automatic | ✅ Automatic |
| IAM Auth | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported |
| Secrets Rotation | ❌ Manual | ✅ Automatic (with RDS Proxy) |
| Cost | Included | ~$15/month for proxy |
| Deployment | Kubernetes pod | Managed service |
Key Differences:
Proxy Deployment:
- GCP: Cloud SQL Proxy runs as Kubernetes pod
- AWS: RDS Proxy is fully managed service
Connection Pooling:
- GCP: No built-in pooling (use external pooler)
- AWS: Built-in connection pooling
Secrets Management:
- GCP: Manual credential management
- AWS: Automatic rotation with Secrets Manager
Feature Parity Matrix
Core Infrastructure
| Feature | GCP | AWS | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Managed Kubernetes | ✅ GKE | ✅ EKS | Both fully managed |
| VPC Networking | ✅ VPC | ✅ VPC | Similar concepts |
| Container Registry | ✅ Artifact Registry | ✅ ECR | Both support scanning |
| Private Clusters | ✅ Built-in | ✅ Via VPC endpoints | GCP simpler |
| Workload Identity | ✅ Workload Identity | ✅ IRSA | Different implementations |
| Auto-scaling | ✅ Built-in | ✅ Addon | Both support |
| Node Pools/Groups | ✅ Node Pools | ✅ Node Groups | Similar concepts |
Network Security
| Feature | GCP | AWS | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Firewall Rules | ✅ Firewall Rules | ✅ Security Groups | Different models |
| Network Policies | ✅ Kubernetes Network Policies | ✅ Kubernetes Network Policies | Same (Kubernetes) |
| Private Service Access | ✅ Private Google Access | ✅ VPC Endpoints | Different implementations |
| Load Balancers | ✅ GCP Load Balancer | ✅ ELB/ALB/NLB | Both support internal |
Database Integration
| Feature | GCP | AWS | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Managed Database | ✅ Cloud SQL | ✅ RDS | Both PostgreSQL/MySQL |
| Database Proxy | ✅ Cloud SQL Proxy | ✅ RDS Proxy | Different deployment models |
| Connection Pooling | ❌ External | ✅ Built-in | AWS advantage |
| IAM Authentication | ✅ Supported | ✅ Supported | Both support |
Cost Comparison
| Resource | GCP | AWS | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control Plane | Free | $0.10/hour (~$73/month) | GCP advantage |
| Node (e2-medium/t3.medium) | ~$0.10/hour | ~$0.05-0.10/hour | Similar |
| NAT Gateway | ~$0.045/hour | ~$0.045/hour | Similar |
| Load Balancer | ~$0.025/hour | ~$0.025/hour | Similar |
| Container Registry | $0.10/GB/month | $0.10/GB/month | Same |
| Database (db-f1-micro/db.t3.micro) | ~$0.02/hour | ~$0.02/hour | Similar |
| Database Proxy | Free (pod) | ~$0.02/hour | GCP advantage |
Typical Lab Costs (per day, destroyed quickly):
- GCP: $5-10/day
- AWS: $8-15/day (includes control plane cost)
Technical Deep Dive
Networking Architecture
GCP (VPC-Native)
GKE Pod
│
│ (VPC-native IP)
▼
GCP VPC
│
│ (direct routing)
▼
Internet / GCP ServicesCharacteristics:
- Pods get VPC IPs directly
- No overlay network
- Simpler IP management
- Better performance (no encapsulation)
AWS (CNI Plugin)
EKS Pod
│
│ (CNI plugin)
▼
ENI (Elastic Network Interface)
│
│ (VPC routing)
▼
AWS VPC
│
│
▼
Internet / AWS ServicesCharacteristics:
- Pods use ENIs (secondary IPs)
- More flexible IP management
- Can use custom CNI plugins
- More complex configuration
Authentication Models
GCP: Workload Identity
yaml
# Service Account Annotation
annotations:
iam.gke.io/gcp-service-account: "service-account@project.iam.gserviceaccount.com"How it works:
- GKE service account annotated with GCP service account
- Pod uses GKE service account
- GKE automatically exchanges identity
- Pod authenticates as GCP service account
AWS: IRSA (IAM Roles for Service Accounts)
yaml
# Service Account Annotation
annotations:
eks.amazonaws.com/role-arn: "arn:aws:iam::ACCOUNT:role/ROLE-NAME"How it works:
- Service account annotated with IAM role ARN
- Pod uses service account
- AWS SDK automatically assumes role
- Pod authenticates as IAM role
Key Difference:
- GCP: Identity exchange happens automatically
- AWS: Requires AWS SDK in pod (automatic with SDK)
Private Cluster Access
GCP: Private Endpoint
hcl
resource "google_container_cluster" "private" {
private_cluster_config {
enable_private_endpoint = true
enable_private_nodes = true
}
}Access Methods:
- Bastion host (SSH)
- VPN
- Cloud Shell
- Authorized networks
AWS: VPC Endpoints
hcl
resource "aws_vpc_endpoint" "eks" {
vpc_id = var.vpc_id
service_name = "com.amazonaws.REGION.eks"
vpc_endpoint_type = "Interface"
subnet_ids = var.private_subnet_ids
}Access Methods:
- VPC endpoints (private)
- VPN
- Systems Manager Session Manager
- Bastion host (SSH)
Migration Considerations
GCP → AWS Migration
Key Challenges:
- Networking Model: VPC-native → CNI plugin
- Authentication: Workload Identity → IRSA
- Firewall Rules: Network-level → Instance-level
- Database Proxy: Pod-based → Managed service
- Control Plane Cost: Free → $0.10/hour
Migration Steps:
- Create equivalent VPC structure
- Deploy EKS cluster
- Update authentication (Workload Identity → IRSA)
- Migrate firewall rules to security groups
- Update database connectivity (Cloud SQL Proxy → RDS Proxy)
- Test and validate
AWS → GCP Migration
Key Challenges:
- Networking Model: CNI plugin → VPC-native
- Authentication: IRSA → Workload Identity
- Security Groups: Instance-level → Network-level
- Database Proxy: Managed service → Pod-based
- Control Plane: $0.10/hour → Free
Migration Steps:
- Create equivalent VPC structure
- Deploy GKE cluster
- Update authentication (IRSA → Workload Identity)
- Migrate security groups to firewall rules
- Update database connectivity (RDS Proxy → Cloud SQL Proxy)
- Test and validate
When to Choose Each Provider
Choose GCP If:
✅ You want:
- Lower costs (free control plane)
- Simpler networking (VPC-native)
- Faster setup
- Built-in private clusters
- Google Workspace integration
- Cost-conscious deployments
✅ Your team:
- Already uses GCP
- Prefers simpler architectures
- Values cost optimization
- Needs quick deployments
Choose AWS If:
✅ You want:
- Larger ecosystem
- More regions globally
- Enterprise features
- Connection pooling (RDS Proxy)
- Automatic secrets rotation
- Existing AWS infrastructure
✅ Your team:
- Already uses AWS
- Needs enterprise-scale features
- Requires global coverage
- Values managed services
Best Practices by Provider
GCP Best Practices
- Use VPC-native networking - Leverage GCP's simpler model
- Enable Workload Identity - Secure, automatic authentication
- Use Private Google Access - For GCP service connectivity
- Regional subnets - Take advantage of regional design
- Cloud SQL Proxy - For secure database connectivity
AWS Best Practices
- Use VPC CNI - Standard networking model
- Enable IRSA - For pod-level IAM authentication
- Use VPC Endpoints - For private AWS service access
- RDS Proxy - For connection pooling and failover
- Security Groups - Instance-level security